svn commit: r442220 - in head/sysutils: . py-gmailfs-fuse

[Mathieu Arnold]

Le 01/06/2017 à 10:42, Mahdi Mokhtari a écrit :
> > Might be a good time to change fusefs from an arbitrary port/pkg name
> > prefix not accurately reflecting upstream names and use a virtual
> > category instead.
>
> > I'm planning to do this for all Python django ports too, as their names
> > don't match their upstream counterparts as users expect or when they're
> > searching.
>
> Ok, it seems good idea to me :-)
> Should we start adding it ("fusefs" or "fuse") to Mk/* then adding it
> to CATEGORIES of fuse ports?

You should start by reading the documentation. It is always a good place
to start.

https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/committers-guide/article.html#ports-qa-new-category

-- 
Mathieu Arnold


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 949 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all/attachments/20170601/83648298/attachment.sig>