svn commit: r456527 - in head/databases: . postgis20 postgis21 postgis22 postgis23 postgis24

[Rodrigo Osorio]

On 12/18/17 02:00, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 01:25:43PM +0100, Rodrigo Osorio wrote:
>> On 12/17/17 12:41, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>>> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 11:25:14AM +0000, Rodrigo Osorio wrote:
>>>> New Revision: 456527
>>>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/456527
>>>>
>>>> Log:
>>>>     Add new port postgis24 for v2.4.x
>>>>
>>>> Added:
>>>>     head/databases/postgis24/
>>>>     head/databases/postgis24/Makefile   (contents, props changed)
>>>>     head/databases/postgis24/distinfo   (contents, props changed)
>>>>     head/databases/postgis24/pkg-descr   (contents, props changed)
>>>>     head/databases/postgis24/pkg-install   (contents, props changed)
>>>>     head/databases/postgis24/pkg-plist   (contents, props changed)
>>> Looks like it should've been repocopied, not added as a new port.
>>> Can you explain why this wasn't done?
>> I don't get your question, do you see any issue regarding postgis24 port?
> I have an issue not with the port per se, but with the way it was carried
> out (added to the collection).  Please read Section 19.4* of the Ports
> Committer's Guide, albeit I'm surprised that your mentor did not tell you
> about it earlier.
Now I understand...

To clarify my mentor instruct me about the procedure but it was a long 
time ago.
I don't do this kind of commit so often, and this is probably my mistake.

> If you're subscribed to svn-ports-* ML (like you should), you would have
> also known about this procedure, it's not something uncommon.
>
> ./danfe
>
> *) https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/committers-guide/ports.html#ports-qa-repocopies
>