svn commit: r422981 - in head/dns: bind9-devel bind910 bind911 bind99

Mathieu Arnold mat at FreeBSD.org
Tue Oct 4 14:36:31 UTC 2016


Le 04/10/2016 à 16:35, Baptiste Daroussin a écrit :
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 04:27:20PM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>> Le 04/10/2016 à 16:22, John Marino a écrit :
>>> On 10/4/2016 09:18, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>>>> Le 04/10/2016 à 16:16, John Marino a écrit :
>>>>> On 10/4/2016 09:13, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>>>>>> Le 04/10/2016 à 16:04, John Marino a écrit :
>>>>>>> We build under a very heavy load which flushes out marginally unsafe
>>>>>>> ports.
>>>>>> Ok, so make(1) from dragonfly has the same bug make(1) from FreeBSD 9
>>>>>> has, feel free to fix it in dragonfly's port tree.
>>>>> master has bmake 20160818 on it (for last 5 weeks)
>>>>> Release 4.6 has bmake 20141111.
>>>>> Do you know if make bug only applies to master?
>>>> I have no idea.  I was told the problem was with make(1) on FreeBSD 9,
>>>> which seemed to be right, as it does not fail at all on FreeBSD 10/11
>>>> with -j 2-10.
>>> The -j number is not the only factor here.  I've seen ports pass under
>>> very high -j numbers but start failing when the server gets loaded.
>>>
>>> DragonFly has the lastest bmake, modern binutils, modern gcc and it
>>> doesn't have fmake (what freebsd 9 uses).
>>>
>>> Why is it so critical to classify bind910 as jobs safe when there
>>> clearly is a question about it?  Let's not immediately assume DF is at
>>> fault here.  As I mentioned before, it could easily be the build tests
>>> you're doing aren't sufficient to flush this out.  It *was* marked
>>> UNSAFE before, obviously with good reason.  (albeit undocumented)
>> It works just fine on all supported FreeBSD versions as it is, like I
>> said, feel free to change it in dragonfly's ports tree.
>>
> No it does not see my reply I have reproduced at least 2 times on make -j40.
>
> It is not 100% reproducible but happen from time to time.

Oh, ok, I thought you were saying it was ok for you too.

-- 
Mathieu Arnold


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 949 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all/attachments/20161004/6698e12d/attachment.sig>


More information about the svn-ports-all mailing list