svn commit: r410453 - in head/math/fityk: . files

Mathieu Arnold mat at FreeBSD.org
Tue Mar 8 15:32:19 UTC 2016


+--On 8 mars 2016 16:27:48 +0100 Pietro Cerutti <gahr at gahr.ch> wrote:
| On 2016-03-08 16:25, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
|> +--On 8 mars 2016 16:06:59 +0100 Pietro Cerutti <gahr at gahr.ch> wrote:
|> | So, danfe@, would you mind explaining to me on which basis muting 
|> MKDIRs
|> | is "at one's discretion" while muting INSTALLs is "actually wrong"?
|> | 
|> | Given the evidence pointed at by mat@, either both muting MKDIR and
|> | INSTALL commands is at one's discretion, or neither is.
|> 
|> Ok, the IMPORTANT bit here, is that the *install* phase is the most
|> important one from the end-user point of view.
|> 
|> It's where things go live, and his system is modified.
|> 
|> So we want to show up things thare are modifying his system.  All of 
|> them.
|> 
|> Some argue that mkdir are not that important and can be muted, I kinda
|> disagree.
|> 
|> And as the doc is how portmgr thinks things should be (in that case, 
|> it's
|> been a couple of years where that means what *I* think), well, it's how 
|> I
|> documented it.
| 
| I completely agree with you.

And it's what I added to https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5581

-- 
Mathieu Arnold
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 949 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all/attachments/20160308/e1ec262a/attachment.sig>


More information about the svn-ports-all mailing list