svn commit: r406930 - head/archivers/file-roller

John Marino freebsd.contact at marino.st
Mon Jan 25 09:50:26 UTC 2016


On 1/25/2016 9:56 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 01:19:37PM +0000, John Marino wrote:
>> New Revision: 406930
>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/406930
>>
>> Log:
>>   archivers/file_roller: Fix ambiguous RUN_DEPENDS
>>   
>>   file_roller requires the ports version of unzip (I'm assuming based on
>>   makefile's specifications).  However, since the full path to unzip
>>   was not specified, the base unzip satifies the requirement which results
>>   in the archivers/unzip package not being registered as a run dependency.
>>  
>> [...]
>>  RUN_DEPENDS=	gtar:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/gtar \
>> -    		unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
>> +    		zipinfo:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
>> +
>> +# Port unzip is desired, but specify the uniquely named zipinfo to ensure
>> +# archivers/unzip is pulled in.  Using "unzip" is satisfied by base unzip
> 
> Another option would be to specify full path of unzip(1), i.e.
> ${LOCALBASE}/bin/unzip:...  This would also reflect the reality, since if
> base unzip(1) is not sufficient beyond trivial usecases (which is probably
> the reason why `archivers/file-roller' wants "real" unzip -- e.g. the one
> that support encrypted archives and stuff).

zipinfo is a symbolic link to $LOCALBASE/bin/unzip, so I used it to
minimize the change.  I saw the two as equal and thus "dealer's choice"
and I chose the latter.

> You've also introduced trailing whitespace there (in addition to the one in
> pkg-descr, existing prior to this commit).

oops.





More information about the svn-ports-all mailing list