svn commit: r412296 - head/lang/rust

[John Marino (FreeBSD)]

On 4/1/2016 12:05 PM, Thomas Zander wrote:
> On 1 April 2016 at 11:45, Mathieu Arnold <mat at freebsd.org> wrote:
> 
>> It is documented in the porter's handbook, where it all belongs:
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> ww.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/makefile-maintainer.html>
>> 
>> And, it is covered by the "Trivial and tested build and runtime 
>> fixes."
>> bullet point.
> 
> Thanks for stepping in, but I am a 100% sure that this statement will
> not put the case to rest. Based on this statement:
> - John will maintain his position that this commit was trivial, tested
> and fixes a problem *on DragonFly* and hence *is* covered by the
> blanket
> - I will maintain my position that this commit does *not* fix a
> problem *on FreeBSD* and hence is *not* covered by the blanket
> 
> I am totally fine accepting any verdict from portmgr, but I want it to
> be inescapably clear. Please review the commit and let us know once
> and for all: Is this particular one covered by the blanket or not?
> 

It appears lang/rust just became a critical port.
It's now required for www/firefox.

I was going to offer to remove DF support from lang/rust because we have 
two other rust ports, but if it's required for mozilla, I think DF 
testing becomes rather critical.

Unless the dependency on rust by firefox is optional and DF can remove 
it?  I would almost prefer that, the firefox dependency on rust scares 
me a lot.

John