svn commit: r390485 - head/devel/p5-Test-Simple

[Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh]

On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 12:45 AM, Adam Weinberger <adamw at adamw.org> wrote:

> > On 24 Jun, 2015, at 10:13, Adam Weinberger <adamw at adamw.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On 24 Jun, 2015, at 9:36, Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh <sunpoet at freebsd.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:18 PM, Adam Weinberger <adamw at adamw.org>
> wrote:
> >>> On 24 Jun, 2015, at 9:14, Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh <sunpoet at freebsd.org>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:54 PM, Adam Weinberger <adamw at freebsd.org>
> wrote:
> >>> Author: adamw
> >>> Date: Wed Jun 24 14:54:11 2015
> >>> New Revision: 390485
> >>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/390485
> >>>
> >>> Log:
> >>>  Update to 1.001014.
> >>>
> >>>  Changes: https://metacpan.org/changes/distribution/Test-Simple
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> This update would bring conflicts with devel/p5-Test-Tester and
> devel/p5-Test-use-ok.
> >>> That's why I did not update devel/p5-Test-File to 1.42+ (which
> requires Test::Builder 1.001006+).
> >>> IMHO, it would be better to replace all p5-Test-Tester and
> p5-Test-use-ok along with this update.
> >>
> >> Sorry, I'm not following what you mean by "replace all". Do you mean
> remove the p5-Test-Tester and p5-Test-use-ok ports and repoint those
> dependencies to p5-Test-Simple?
> >>
> >> # Adam
> >>
> >>
> >> Yes, I meant to say "replace all p5-Test-Tester and p5-Test-use-ok
> occurrence with latest p5-Test-Simple".
> >> And these dependencies would become conditional as they are in core
> since lang/perl5.22.
> >> For p5-Test-Tester and p5-Test-use-ok, we could mark them DEPRECATED
> and set EXPIRATION_DATE to end of July.
> >
> > I'm thinking it's probably also worth putting an entry into UPDATING to
> minimize the number of people confused by sudden build failures, no?
>
> Okay I think I've gotten all the dependencies moved over, set DEPRECATED
> and EXPIRATION_DATE on both the ports, and added an UPDATING entry.
>
> Thanks for bringing this to my attention, sunpoet!
>
> # Adam
>
>
> --
> Adam Weinberger
> adamw at adamw.org
> http://www.adamw.org
>
>
Thanks for your quick response. Everything looks great now. :)

Regards,
sunpoet