svn commit: r390485 - head/devel/p5-Test-Simple

Adam Weinberger adamw at adamw.org
Wed Jun 24 16:13:55 UTC 2015


> On 24 Jun, 2015, at 9:36, Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh <sunpoet at freebsd.org> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:18 PM, Adam Weinberger <adamw at adamw.org> wrote:
> > On 24 Jun, 2015, at 9:14, Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh <sunpoet at freebsd.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:54 PM, Adam Weinberger <adamw at freebsd.org> wrote:
> > Author: adamw
> > Date: Wed Jun 24 14:54:11 2015
> > New Revision: 390485
> > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/390485
> >
> > Log:
> >   Update to 1.001014.
> >
> >   Changes: https://metacpan.org/changes/distribution/Test-Simple
> >
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > This update would bring conflicts with devel/p5-Test-Tester and devel/p5-Test-use-ok.
> > That's why I did not update devel/p5-Test-File to 1.42+ (which requires Test::Builder 1.001006+).
> > IMHO, it would be better to replace all p5-Test-Tester and p5-Test-use-ok along with this update.
> 
> Sorry, I'm not following what you mean by "replace all". Do you mean remove the p5-Test-Tester and p5-Test-use-ok ports and repoint those dependencies to p5-Test-Simple?
> 
> # Adam
> 
> 
> Yes, I meant to say "replace all p5-Test-Tester and p5-Test-use-ok occurrence with latest p5-Test-Simple".
> And these dependencies would become conditional as they are in core since lang/perl5.22.
> For p5-Test-Tester and p5-Test-use-ok, we could mark them DEPRECATED and set EXPIRATION_DATE to end of July.

I'm thinking it's probably also worth putting an entry into UPDATING to minimize the number of people confused by sudden build failures, no?

# Adam


-- 
Adam Weinberger
adamw at adamw.org
http://www.adamw.org





More information about the svn-ports-all mailing list