svn commit: r392921 - in head: Mk accessibility/linux-c6-atk audio/linux-c6-alsa-lib audio/linux-c6-alsa-plugins-oss audio/linux-c6-alsa-plugins-pulseaudio audio/linux-c6-alsa-utils audio/linux-c6-...

[Antoine Brodin]

On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Alexander Leidinger
<netchild at freebsd.org> wrote:
> Author: netchild
> Date: Sun Jul 26 13:06:24 2015
> New Revision: 392921
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/392921
>
> Log:
>   64 bit linuxulator support (not activated by default):
>    - most of the work was done by Alan Jude
>    - all errors are mine
>    - 64bit (may) have rough edges
>    - I validated
>       * that the 32bit part doesn't has deinstall regressions
>       * 29 of 72 64bit ports ports don't have deinstall leftovers (more validation
>         later, when I dare to activate the 64bit linuxulator in the kernel)
>    - the infrastructure part looks mature enough to let more test-bunnies get
>      some experience with it
>    - to use it you shall have no linux ports installed and have to specify
>      (on your own risk) the following in make.conf before installing the ports:
>      OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=c6_64
>      OVERRIDE_LINUX_NONBASE_PORTS=c6_64
>
>   This is on top of the exiting c6 linux ports. Given that CentOS 7 is 64bits
>   only, we decided to have it as an "overlay" instead of new ports.
>   The 64bit part only installs 64bit executables, the 32bit ports can not be
>   installed at the same time (if needed we can think of letting the 64bit
>   overlay install the 32bit parts too, but given the CentOS 7 comment
>   above...).
>
>   Differential Revision:        https://reviews.freebsd.org/D174
>   Submitted by:         alanjude
>   Sponsored by:         Essen FreeBSD Hackathon 2015
>   Reviewed by:          xmj, eadler (earlier versions)
>   Approved by:          portmgr (implicit, I remember blanked approval for
>                         linux parts loooong ago, punish me if you don't
>                         agree anymore)

Hi,

This broke INDEX.  Also,  portmgr@ asked some questions and requested
an exp-run in D1746 and those requests were ignored.  So I doubt it
was approved.

Cheers,

Antoine