svn commit: r394456 - head/devel/doxygen

[David Chisnall]

On 17 Aug 2015, at 13:05, Mathieu Arnold <mat at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> 
> +--On 17 août 2015 15:00:04 +0200 John Marino <freebsd.contact at marino.st>
> wrote:
> | On 8/17/2015 2:33 PM, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> |> The problem: doxygen generated Doxyfiles list perl path in them as
> |> /usr/bin/perl, while on FreeBSD perl resides in /usr/local/bin/perl.
> |> However, doxyfiles are used on other systems as well, and /usr/bin/perl
> |> seems to me more widely used path. Imo this should not ever be
> |> hardcoded.
> | 
> | For FreeBSD and DragonFly, /usr/bin/perl is wrong.   Why wouldn't ports
> | tailor doxygen files for those two systems?
> | 
> | Or to put it another way: Why would you advocating something this is
> | 100% wrong on the systems that ports support in favor of "other systems"
> | that aren't supported?
> | 
> | Maybe I'm missing something?
> 
> I guess it's about people using doxygen on FreeBSD to generate stuff that
> they'll use outside of FreeBSD will get a bad shebang in the stuff that was
> generated.

What’s wrong with #!/usr/bin/env perl ?

David