svn commit: r346114 - head/devel/p4.el

Pietro Cerutti gahr at FreeBSD.org
Mon Mar 10 14:17:05 UTC 2014


On 2014-Mar-10, 14:38, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> +--On 10 mars 2014 08:32:52 -0400 Adam Weinberger <adamw at adamw.org> wrote:
> | On 2014/03/10 03:24, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> |> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 12:34:20PM +0100, Emanuel Haupt wrote:
> |>> Mathieu Arnold <mat at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> |>> > Taking one amongst many, the current practice is to mute the MKDIR
> |>> > and not mute commands that install files. Would you mind respecting
> |>> > that in the future ?
> |> 
> |>> This is just a matter of opinion. I've always preferred to see what is
> |>> being installed or what direcories are being created. Even the example
> |>> in the PHB doesn't mute the mkdir. Unless this gets correcte in the 
> |>> PHB
> |>> I won't change this.
> | 
> | Alexey -
> | 
> | You make this request every few days, it seems, and the response is
> | always the same: it's not in the PHB.
> | 
> | You should put it there. It SHOULD be policy. We should strive for
> | consistency across ports. The ports tree should present a unified
> | experience for all ports, for all users.
> 
> Yes, sorry, it's not in the PHB yet, I'm at section 6.7 at the momment, and
> I'm updating things as I go.
> 
> (And yes, if you're applying old policies from chapters 1 to 5, you should
> go and have a look, things may have changed.)

ports-policy-change-announce@ comes to mind :) Has anybody else ever felt
the desire to get notified whenever a policy is updated? Just to avoid
having to skim through commit logs.

-- 
Pietro Cerutti
The FreeBSD Project
gahr at FreeBSD.org

PGP Public Key:
http://gahr.ch/pgp
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 964 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all/attachments/20140310/f9ade15a/attachment.sig>


More information about the svn-ports-all mailing list