svn commit: r365590 - in head/cad/spice: . files

John Marino freebsd.contact at marino.st
Thu Aug 21 22:27:58 UTC 2014


On 8/22/2014 00:12, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 8/21/2014 5:09 PM, Hiroki Sato wrote:
>> John Marino <freebsd.contact at marino.st> wrote
>>   in <53F663B2.3000800 at marino.st>:
>>
>> fr> On 8/21/2014 21:41, Hiroki Sato wrote:
>> fr> > Author: hrs
>> fr> > Date: Thu Aug 21 19:41:06 2014
>> fr> > New Revision: 365590
>> fr> > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/365590
>> fr> > QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r365590/
>>
>> ...
>>
>> fr> I'm sorry, but using freebsd-specific <bsd.prog.mk> in a ports vendor
>> fr> makefile is NOT an improvement and frankly puts the build at risk on
>> fr> DragonFly.
>> fr>
>> fr> I wish there was a rule that ports should not use system make fragments.
>> fr>  This is not a good practice.  This port had a perfectly working and
>> fr> generic makefile before.
>> fr>
>> fr> There's a good chance this just broke spice on DragonFly as the system
>> fr> make file these are different.
>>
>>  I can understand that vendor's Makefile should be platform-neutral,
>>  but I do not think there is advantage to maintain
>>  ${FILESDIR}/Makefile in a way not to use FreeBSD-specific stuff
>>  because it is used only by the port.  Should we care about build on
>>  DragonFly?
> 
> No! This is FreeBSD. Ports is only officially supported on FreeBSD.
> 
> There are plenty of other ports using bsd.prog.mk.

Putting the first statement aside which frankly contradicts other
statements made by other portmgr and completely belittles my
contributions, this is a bad idea for FreeBSD too.  You are not
containing the port to ports collection.  If the system makefile
fragment changes, it affects the port. It's a dumb decision.  If you
want these makefile fragments, put a tailored copy of Mk/

In this PARTICULAR case, I staged the port.  I fixed that makefile.  HRS
changes serve no purpose other than to potentially break my work.
Obviously that is not his intention, but that is the result.

Frankly he should revert this immediately.  It was working before
everywhere.

John


More information about the svn-ports-all mailing list