svn commit: r320152 - head/net/v6eval

Eitan Adler eadler at freebsd.org
Sat Jun 8 17:56:15 UTC 2013


On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Bryan Drewery <bdrewery at freebsd.org> wrote:
> For some cases, as you say, the COPYING file is boilerplate and contains no customizations. In those cases it makes sense to use standard. If its been customized with names, years, links, it must be included.
>
> I'm not sure why this issue keeps coming up. These licenses must be respected.

Probably because the license framework is broken and does not play
nicely with how licenses work in practice.  I've brought up issues
with LEGAL, LICENSE, and related systems before with tabthorpe, but
the issues are complex and may very well require a lawyer involved for
tricky cases.



-- 
Eitan Adler
Source, Ports, Doc committer
Bugmeister, Ports Security teams


More information about the svn-ports-all mailing list