svn commit: r322444 - head/Tools/scripts

[Eitan Adler]

On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 3:18 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe at freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 04:23:05PM -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>> On 7/8/2013 4:12 PM, Adam Weinberger wrote:
>> >> A few options with no preference for any particular one:
>> >> (a) Mk/ even though it isn't actually a .mk file.
>> >> (b) Tools/infrastructure is also okay.
>> >> (c) as part of the d4p tarball / port
>> >>
>> >> Tools/scripts is primarily third party utilities so its not as obvious
>> >> that there are critical files in the directory.
>> >
>> > Agreed, if I were to check out a "minimal" tree I would not think to
>> > include Tools.
>> > I'd think Mk/ would be a good place for it---checking out Mk/ should
>> > give you all the
>> > pieces you need, and dialog4ports.sh is now a critical part of the ports
>> > build system.
>
> So is d4p port itself.  Why not just bundle it there?  Mk/ is not really for
> helper shell scripts, even critical ones.

Why not?


-- 
Eitan Adler
Source, Ports, Doc committer
Bugmeister, Ports Security teams