svn commit: r301130 - head/dns/zkt [ID#2012071909000066]

[Alexey Dokuchaev]

On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 09:28:28AM +0200, Carlo Strub wrote:
> 07/19/2012 03:10 - Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 09:39:17PM +0000, Carlo Strub wrote:
> > > --- head/dns/zkt/Makefile Wed Jul 18 21:03:43 2012 (r301129)
> > > +++ head/dns/zkt/Makefile Wed Jul 18 21:39:17 2012 (r301130)
> > > @@ -1,27 +1,30 @@
> > >  # New ports collection makefile for:   zkt
> > >  # Date created:        2008-08-06
> > > -# Whom:                Frank Behrens <frank+ports at ilse.behrens.de>
> > > +# Whom:                Frank Behrens
> > 
> > This header should not be touched.  It reflect the reality when port was
> > first added, and should normally be made more accurate, not less (e.g. by
> > adding previously omitted address).
> 
> If I remember correctly, there was an effort made a few years ago to
> remove all the mail addresses in the headers to not let users bother port
> originators but only maintainers if there was a problem.  Is that not the
> right approach anymore?  I am open for discussion.

I recall someone mentioned this, yes, but 1) this idea is stupid: instead of
removing bits of historical evidence, we should educate our users where to
look for correct maintainer address; 2) however, if we standardize Makefile
header in some way, I will happily follow the standard; 3) I understand your
rationale and not particularly against your commit; 4) I am also open for a
discussion.

./danfe