svn commit: r301039 - head/archivers/zlib

Doug Barton dougb at dougbarton.us
Tue Jul 17 23:14:47 UTC 2012


On 07/17/2012 04:07 PM, Alex Kozlov wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:23:00AM +0200, Niclas Zeising wrote:
>> On 07/17/12 23:38, Doug Barton wrote:
>>> Was this causing you some sort of specific problem? AFAIK this happens
>>> often, possibly as a result of 'make makesum'. "Fixing" this everyplace
>>> that it occurs would almost certainly cause a lot of needless churn.
>
> Actually, it's pretty rare occurrence,

Maybe I'm just lucky then, because I see it all the time.

> so it does not add much churn.
> Also while harmless, this is still an error, like unused variable or typo.

No, it's functionally quite different from either of those, since lack
of a newline produces no actual problems.

> I agree that ideally this type of change should be committed with
> other changes, but it's hard to achieve because usually successive commits
> are made by different committers. 

I'll let others comment as well, but ideally this particular change
wouldn't be committed at all unless that particular file was being
changed otherwise.

> Would be even better to find out why it happens at all, but i've done
> thousands of tests and still can't reproduce it with make makesum. 

I agree that finding out why it happens would be interesting, but we've
got bigger fish to fry.

> It's not necessary.

Then let's not do it. :)

Doug



More information about the svn-ports-all mailing list