svn commit: r309705 - in head/irc: . dxirc

Chris Rees utisoft at gmail.com
Mon Dec 31 18:04:52 UTC 2012


On 31 Dec 2012 17:49, "Jason Helfman" <jgh at freebsd.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 6:06 AM, Jason E. Hale <jhale at freebsd.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Monday, December 31, 2012 03:46:27 Jason Helfman wrote:
>> > Added: head/irc/dxirc/Makefile
>> >
============================================================================
>> > --- /dev/null   00:00:00 1970   (empty, because file is newly added)
>> > +++ head/irc/dxirc/Makefile     Mon Dec 31 03:46:26 2012
 (r309705)
>> > @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
>> >
>> > +LICENSE=     GPLv3
>> > +LICENSE_FILE=        ${WRKSRC}/COPYING
>>
>> LICENSE_FILE should be dropped for standard license
>>
>
> Did you compare the license files before making this comment?

Hm, modifying the GPL is forbidden; how different is it?

>> > +LIB_DEPENDS= FOX-1:${PORTSDIR}/x11-toolkits/fox16
>>
>> The library name is FOX-1.6 despite portlint warnings ".6" is not an ABI
>> version number.
>>
>
> Another reason to drop the ABI warning from portlint. Builds still passed
with, and without it. I will restore it. IMHO I am not in favor of portlint
warnings for this.
>
>>
>> > +OPTIONS_DEFINE=      NLS TRAY IPV6 SSL LUA ENCHANT NOTIFY
>> > +OPTIONS_DEFAULT=     NLS TRAY IPV6 SSL LUA
>>
>> NLS doesn't need to be in OPTIONS_DEFAULT...it is already default.
 Might as
>> well add DOCS to OPTIONS_DEFINE too.
>>
> I wanted to honor what the contributor wanted for defaults in the future
if the defaults ever are to change. I don't see how naming them explicitly
is a problem.
>
>>
>> > Added: head/irc/dxirc/pkg-plist
>> >
============================================================================
>> > == --- /dev/null      00:00:00 1970   (empty, because file is newly
added)
>> > +++ head/irc/dxirc/pkg-plist  Mon Dec 31 03:46:26 2012        (r309705)
>> > @@ -0,0 +1,297 @@
>> > +%%DATADIR%%/COPYING
>>
>> Since LICENSE is already defined, the installation of an additional
license
>> file should be squashed.
>
>
> Good catch. Thanks!
>
>>
>>
>> > + at dirrm share/applications
>>
>> This should be a @dirrmtry since it is a shared directory.
>>
>
> Good catch. Thanks!
>
> -jgh


More information about the svn-ports-all mailing list