From pedro at ambientworks.net Wed May 14 19:04:39 2008 From: pedro at ambientworks.net (Pedro Martelletto) Date: Wed May 14 19:15:45 2008 Subject: Fix freeing of ACLs in 'setfacl' Message-ID: <20080514184820.GA25967@static.protection.cx> Hi, There seems to be a double free condition in 'setfacl', as follows: Initially, 'acl' (an 'acl_t *') is allocated, and its ACCESS_ACL and DEFAULT_ACL fields are passed to the 'libc' ACL routines for subsequent allocation. If the '-m' option (merge existing ACL with a new one) is specified, then 'set_acl_mask()' will be called and passed one of the two ACLs. This function, in turn, replaces this given ACL structure by another, freshly allocated. However, the pointer in the 'acl' variable in the caller is not updated. The caller then proceeds to free the ACL, incurring in a double free condition. This happens for every regular file, directory or symbolic link being operated on, so the consequences are more easily visible when multiple file system objects are involved. A proposed fix is implemented below. Thank you for your attention, -p. (Please directly include my address in eventual replies, as I'm not subscribed to this list.) Index: setfacl.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/bin/setfacl/setfacl.c,v retrieving revision 1.13 diff -u -p -r1.13 setfacl.c --- setfacl.c 26 Feb 2007 00:42:17 -0000 1.13 +++ setfacl.c 14 May 2008 18:22:18 -0000 @@ -245,10 +245,13 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[]) continue; } - if (acl_type == ACL_TYPE_ACCESS) + if (acl_type == ACL_TYPE_ACCESS) { final_acl = acl[ACCESS_ACL]; - else + acl_free(acl[DEFAULT_ACL]); + } else { final_acl = acl[DEFAULT_ACL]; + acl_free(acl[ACCESS_ACL]); + } if (need_mask && (set_acl_mask(&final_acl) == -1)) { warnx("failed to set ACL mask on %s", file->filename); @@ -269,8 +272,7 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[]) } } - acl_free(acl[ACCESS_ACL]); - acl_free(acl[DEFAULT_ACL]); + acl_free(final_acl); free(acl); }