PERFORCE change 154573 for review
M. Warner Losh
imp at bsdimp.com
Sun Dec 14 13:39:55 PST 2008
In message: <200812141559.59329.hselasky at c2i.net>
Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky at c2i.net> writes:
: On Saturday 13 December 2008, Warner Losh wrote:
: > From: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky at c2i.net>
: > Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 154573 for review
: > Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 10:05:32 +0100
: > This is absoultely the wrong way to implement this. It is so wrong, I
: > don't even know where to begin. Consider this an 'over my dead body'
: > level of objection to this design.
: We don't want to check a variable in the softc every time we do a htoleXX() ??
: Do you have a better suggestion?
Usually the bus_space stuff is used for situations like this so that
the drivers don't have to care.
More information about the p4-projects