PERFORCE change 118874 for review

[Garrett Cooper]

Attilio Rao wrote:
> Alexey Tarasov wrote:
>> http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=118874
>>
>> Change 118874 by taleks at taleks_th on 2007/04/27 12:46:48
>>
>>     added code from pxe.c. Now need to find way to install NIC irq 
>> handler.
>>
>> Affected files ...
>>
>> .. //depot/projects/soc2007/taleks-pxe_http/pxe_core.c#3 edit
>> .. //depot/projects/soc2007/taleks-pxe_http/pxe_core.h#3 edit
>>
>> Differences ...
>>
>> ==== //depot/projects/soc2007/taleks-pxe_http/pxe_core.c#3 (text+ko) ====
>>
>> @@ -1,8 +1,38 @@
>> +#include <stand.h>
>> +#include <string.h>
>>  #include "pxe_core.h"
>>  #include "pxe_mem.h"
>>  #include "pxe_ip.h"
>>  #include "pxe_mutex.h"
>>  
>> +#include "btxv86.h"
>> +#include "pxe.h"
>> +
>> +
>> +/* PXE API calls here will be made in same way as in pxeboot.
>> +   the only difference - installation of isr, that was not needed in 
>> pxe.c.
>> +   main problem is that, v86 monitors reflects interrupts,
>> +   we need to change IDT, for correct irq and call pxe_core_isr() 
>> from it.
>> +*/
>> +
>> +/* NOTE: to think about using of this buffers */
>> +#define    PXE_BUFFER_SIZE        0x2000
>> +#define    PXE_TFTP_BUFFER_SIZE    512
>> +static char         scratch_buffer[PXE_BUFFER_SIZE];
>> +static char         data_buffer[PXE_BUFFER_SIZE];
>> +static pxenv_t        *pxenv_p = NULL;        /* PXENV+ */
>> +static pxe_t        *pxe_p   = NULL;    /* !PXE */
>> +static BOOTPLAYER    bootplayer;    /* PXE Cached information. */
>> +
>> +/* defined in pxetramp.s */
>> +extern u_int16_t    __bangpxeseg;
>> +extern u_int16_t    __bangpxeoff;
>> +extern void            __bangpxeentry(void);
>> +extern u_int16_t    __pxenvseg;
>> +extern u_int16_t    __pxenvoff;
>> +extern void            __pxenventry(void);
>> +
>> +/**/
> 
> Could you, please, use here uint16_t instead than u_int16_t as style(9) 
> suggests?
> 
> Attilio

Just checking, but is this the same for other data types, i.e. 
u_int_32_t => uint32_t?

I'm asking because I'm working with the BDB code, and I think it's using 
C99 or older format data elements / types.

Thanks,
-Garrett