PERFORCE change 111375 for review

Matthew Jacob mj at feral.com
Sun Dec 10 16:51:38 PST 2006


This was discussed at length some months back and the consensus with PHK 
and others was to do this at the GEOM level. If you don't mind, I'll 
look at yours.

> On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 05:54:19AM +0000, Matt Jacob wrote:
>> http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=111375
>>
>> Change 111375 by mjacob at mjexp on 2006/12/10 05:53:25
>>
>> 	Just to get it down... very first baby steps cut at the
>> 	start of a multipath geometry class.
>
> Hmm, you are doing multipath GEOM class?
> I already has a GEOM class which does dynamic multipathing and failover
> at GEOM level. I thought this is incorrect way of implementing
> multipathing. I think Scott was talking about doing it at the CAM
> level AFAIR.
>
> Anyway, my code is in:
>
> 	//depot/user/pjd/geom_classes/sys/geom/rome/...
>
> -- 
> Pawel Jakub Dawidek                       http://www.wheel.pl
> pjd at FreeBSD.org                           http://www.FreeBSD.org
> FreeBSD committer                         Am I Evil? Yes, I Am!
>


More information about the p4-projects mailing list