PERFORCE change 111194 for review

[Divacky Roman]

On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 12:01:27PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Quoting Divacky Roman <xdivac02 at stud.fit.vutbr.cz> (from Thu, 7 Dec  
> 2006 11:37:55 +0100):
> 
> >On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 08:08:29AM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> >>Quoting Roman Divacky <rdivacky at FreeBSD.org> (from Wed, 6 Dec 2006
> >>13:23:42 GMT):
> >>
> >>>http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=111194
> >>>
> >>>Change 111194 by rdivacky at rdivacky_witten on 2006/12/06 13:23:04
> >>>
> >>>	Add an XXX comment about signal delivery in linux_exit_group.
> >>>	We currently ignore sending a signal if SIGNAL_EXIT_GROUP is set
> >>>	condition. We dont even implement this flag....
> >>
> >>What about a printf in case the flag is set? This way we should notice
> >>if it is used somewhere. We could also correlate this with application
> >>misbehavior.
> >
> >we dont even implement the functionality of the flag.
> 
> Yes, and to get a glue how important it is, we should print a message.

you dont understand.. the flag is not passed in or something. its an
internal thing. kernel sets that under some conditions...