PERFORCE change 111194 for review

[Divacky Roman]

On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 08:08:29AM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Quoting Roman Divacky <rdivacky at FreeBSD.org> (from Wed, 6 Dec 2006  
> 13:23:42 GMT):
> 
> >http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=111194
> >
> >Change 111194 by rdivacky at rdivacky_witten on 2006/12/06 13:23:04
> >
> >	Add an XXX comment about signal delivery in linux_exit_group.
> >	We currently ignore sending a signal if SIGNAL_EXIT_GROUP is set
> >	condition. We dont even implement this flag....
> 
> What about a printf in case the flag is set? This way we should notice  
> if it is used somewhere. We could also correlate this with application  
> misbehavior.

we dont even implement the functionality of the flag.. I quickly looked
at the linux source and I dont understand much what its good for
any when its set... looks like when coredumping etc.