XEN 5.5.0 and clflush
Kostik Belousov
kostikbel at gmail.com
Tue Sep 22 14:14:43 UTC 2009
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 09:59:14AM -0400, Larry Baird wrote:
> Kostik,
>
> > I am sorry for delay in answering, you may use this temporal patch until
> > the issue is resolved somehow.
> >
> > I think I will have to disable CLFLUSH support for intel CPUs when self-snoop
> > is not reported.
> Thanks for the feedback? Have you heard about this being a problem on
> platforms other than XEN?
No, and AMD should have CPUs without self-snoop, but supporting CLFLUSH.
This is the main reason for this optimization came in, and no single complain
from this problem on AMD (i.e. on native CPU, not under the hypervisor).
> I am not sure how many FreeBSD users are using
> XEN. If this is a large base, getting a fix in before FreeBSD 8 is
> released would be nice. (-:
>
> Larry
>
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Larry Baird | http://www.gta.com
> Global Technology Associates, Inc. | Orlando, FL
> Email: lab at gta.com | TEL 407-380-0220, FAX 407-380-6080
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-xen/attachments/20090922/a21642da/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-xen
mailing list