[rfc] Radeon AGP support patches
Tijl Coosemans
tijl at FreeBSD.org
Mon Oct 27 16:02:09 UTC 2014
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 16:16:31 +0200 Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 04:24:42PM +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
>> I worked on AGP support for Radeon cards this week. Please take a look
>> at the attached patches.
>>
>> Patch 1:
>> Adds support for AGP_USER_TYPES to sys/dev/agp. For normal memory types
>> a vm_object is allocated, for user types only a vm_page array. It is
>> then up to the caller (e.g. TTM code) to manage this array. Arbitrary
>> pages can be mapped into the GTT this way.
>>
>> Patch 3:
>> Enable AGP support in sys/dev/drm2. In PCI mode the GTT exists on the
>> graphics card so when accessing system memory it already does its own
>> virtual address translation and only physical addresses appear on the
>> system bus. The CPU can access the same addresses with its own VM
>> system like it always does. In AGP mode, translation is done by the
>> AGP chipset so fictitious addresses appear on the system bus. For the
>> CPU cache management to work correctly it needs to use these same
>> fictitious addresses instead of using the real physical addresses
>> directly. The patch marks the AGP aperture range fictitious in
>> radeon_device.c where the VRAM aperture is also marked fictitious such
>> that PHYS_TO_VM_PAGE in ttm_bo_vm_fault works for addresses in this
>> range.
>>
>> The rest of the patch is mostly porting to our agp_* API. It also
>> fixes two memory leaks in ttm_agp_backend.c. One is a missing free in
>> ttm_agp_tt_create. The other is because ttm_agp_bind allocates an
>> agp_memory struct but ttm_agp_unbind does not free it. So when calling
>> ttm_agp_bind a second time the reference to the struct is lost. The
>> patch changes ttm_agp_bind so the allocation only happens in the first
>> call. The struct is released in ttm_agp_destroy.
> Looking at the combination of patch 1 + 3.
>
> Do you really need to change the container for the AGP_USER_MEMORY ?
> Wouldn't it be enough to allocate array in ttm_agp_bind() and copy
> pointers to pages from the agp backing object to the array ?
In ttm_agp_bind the ttm->pages array is already populated. These are
the pages that need to be put into the GTT. The patch modifies struct
agp_memory in sys/dev/agp such that ttm->pages can be passed via
agp_bind_memory. Maybe it would be better to add two new functions to
sys/dev/agp/agp.c: agp_bind_pages and agp_unbind_pages. These would
take a vm_page_t array as argument and bind/unbind the pages directly
in the GTT. There's no need for ttm_agp_bind to call agp_alloc_memory
then and struct agp_memory would not be involved at all. Does that
sound better?
More information about the freebsd-x11
mailing list