xf86-video-intel and UMS

[Robert Millan]

2011/3/4 Lucius Windschuh <lwindschuh at googlemail.com>:
> 2011/3/4 Robert Millan <rmh at debian.org>:
>> Can someone explain why is xf86-video-intel 2.7.1 used in ports?  Unless
>> I missed something, the GIT repository in FDO has more recent branches
>> where UMS hasn't been removed yet:
>>
>> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-intel/log/?h=2.8
>> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-intel/log/?h=2.9
>>
>> Is 2.7.1 really the latest portable version?
>
> It's at least the last version that works reliably and is compatible
> to our libdrm, as I see it.
> The xf86-video-intel v2.9 triggers assertions in our libdrm_intel.so.1
> (just tested it) :-(

Why not upgrade libdrm then?  Is there a problem with versions
newer than 2.4.17?

-- 
Robert Millan