r350 drm

[Eric Anholt]

On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 00:18 -0500, Jonathan Noack wrote:
> On 05/04/05 23:59, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 23:48 -0500, Jonathan Noack wrote:
> >>I decided to play around with all the new DRM/DRI/XORG/ETC stuff.  I 
> >>looked over at the r300.sourceforge.net site for some info, added my 
> >>All-In-Wonder 9800 Pro to the PCI IDs (see attached drm.diff), and then 
> >>kldloaded radeon.  Looks like it worked successfully:
> >>
> >>kernel: drm0: <ATI Radeon NH R350 9800 Pro> port 0x7800-0x78ff mem 
> >>0xd0000000-0xd7ffffff,0xefcf0000-0xefcfffff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci1
> >>kernel: info: [drm] AGP at 0xe0000000 128MB
> >>kernel: info: [drm] Initialized radeon 1.16.0 20050311 on minor 0
> >>kernel: info: [drm] Loading R300 Microcode
> >>
> >>With the xorg-server-snapshot and dri-devel I seem to have even enabled 
> >>direct rendering (see Xorg log output in attached drm.txt), although 
> >>render acceleration is disabled.
> > 
> > You did install both the DRM and DRI driver from r300.sf.net CVS, right?
> > I was wrong about our kernel DRM really supporting r300 -- the
> > development is now happening in their CVS, until they get things
> > stabilized.
> > 
> > This patch should be sent to r300.sf.net folks once you get it working,
> > assuming they don't already have it in their CVS.
> > 
> > http://dri.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/moin.cgi/DriTroubleshooting  has
> > instructions on troubleshooting DRI issues.
> 
> No, that patch is the only change I made.  I pulled the PCI ID from the 
> r300 CVS, so they already have it.  If the r300 support in our kernel 
> DRM doesn't work then I have accomplished nothing because I was just 
> making the r350 look like an r300.  So much for the easy way...

Hopefully soon they'll be ready to merge back to DRM and Mesa CVS.  I'll
only be merging DRM CVS to FreeBSD-current, though.

-- 
Eric Anholt                                     eta at lclark.edu
http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/              anholt at FreeBSD.org