negotiating HT params at assoc in sta mode

[PseudoCylon]

On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Adrian Chadd <adrian at freebsd.org> wrote:
> On 15 February 2013 18:21, PseudoCylon <moonlightakkiy at yahoo.ca> wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Adrian Chadd <adrian at freebsd.org> wrote:
>>> Hm, that sounds right, what's the code doing wrong?
>>
>> Currently, it seems the sta sends back ht params the ap included in a
>> PROBE_RESP packet. So, the ap could send ampdu packets bigger (in
>> byte) than the sta can handle or packet gaps are different from the
>> sta wants after ba session is created. (During ba session negotiation,
>> these params are not exchanged, only window sizes (frame count), seq
>> #, and token.)
>
> Right. yes, we should be negotiating the ampdu density to be the
> maximum of what the AP and STA can associate.
>
> Same deal with IBSS peers (and mesh peers too, eventually.)

Yes. But because of this test
http://fxr.watson.org/fxr/source/net80211/ieee80211_ht.c#L2649
only nodes in sta mode are affected.


AK

>
>
>
> Adrian