Please Test: Updated Ral Driver Patch for rt2860/rt3090

[PseudoCylon]

On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Adrian Chadd <adrian at freebsd.org> wrote:
> Did we ever port that bar fix to 8, 7?

No.
One time I manually patched 8.2-RELEASE with all 80211 stack updates,
but ifconfig didn't work with patched kernel. So, I updated ifconfig.
Then it wanted a newer library (don't remember exactly which). That
was when I gave up.

>
> I'm pretty sure I giot it in before -9 made it..

Yes, it is in 9.0-RELEASE


AK

>
>
>
> adrian
>
> On 13 March 2012 16:42, PseudoCylon <moonlightakkiy at yahoo.ca> wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:30 AM, Aleksandr Rybalko <ray at dlink.ua> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:55:06 -0600
>>> PseudoCylon <moonlightakkiy at yahoo.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> > ------------------------------
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Message: 12
>>>>> > Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:14:23 -0700
>>>>> > From: Adrian Chadd <adrian at freebsd.org>
>>>>> > Subject: Re: Please Test: Updated Ral Driver Patch for
>>>>> > rt2860/rt3090 To: "Sevan / Venture37" <venture37 at gmail.com>
>>>>> > Cc: freebsd-wireless at freebsd.org
>>>>> > Message-ID:
>>>>> >        <CAJ-Vmo=jJmwY=bTVaKFYTd--1E9vzwgn54VMJyY82bc9pSWcBg at mail.gmail.com>
>>>>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On 11 March 2012 14:10, Sevan / Venture37 <venture37 at gmail.com>
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >>> I'll post a new one in a bit. If you want to help, would you be
>>>>> >>> ok with git as opposed to hg?
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> nope not at all but if its because of familiarity then in this
>>>>> >> scenario it doesn't make much difference which is used, same work
>>>>> >> flow, change, commit, push, pull, rinse, repeat. :)
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Hiya,
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Let's just strip the ^M's from the tree and as long as ray@ and
>>>>> > pseudocyclon are a-ok with the work thus far, I'll commit it to
>>>>> > -HEAD.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > We can then tidy things up from there.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I just don't want to commit ^M's to the tree, or blatant style(9)
>>>>> > violations. But we can always tidy things up incrementally once
>>>>> > they're in the tree.
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> I've talked about ieee80211_send_bar() with matt, already.
>>>
>>> Can you please point me to that discussion?
>>>
>>
>> rt2860_send_bar() is a workaround. Because we patched freebsd
>> ieee80211_send_bar(), we can simply call it instead of calling the
>> workaround function on r225013 and up.
>>
>>
>> AK