vuln.xml *is* XML (was Re: vuln.xml is not XML)
kuriyama at imgsrc.co.jp
Mon Aug 30 17:23:21 PDT 2004
At Mon, 30 Aug 2004 19:15:02 -0500,
Jacques Vidrine wrote:
> > I refer to my previous message regarding the difficulties in parsing
> > vuln.xml. I have since learned that any markup (e.g. <p>) should be
> > be in
> > a CDATA section.
> > See http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/ and look at section 2.7.
> > CDATA sections begin with the string "<![CDATA[" and end with the
> > string "]]>":]
> > I propose that markup be enclosed with a CDATA section.
> No this is absolutely wrong :-) The XHTML is embedded with VuXML...
> the whole document is one XML document. Some elements are in the VuXML
> namespace, while others are in the XHTML namespace. Markup cannot
> exist in a CDATA section--- if it is in a CDATA section, it is *not*
> markup but *text content*.
Both are correct. In good old XML world, we should use CDATA section
to quote external markup. On the other hand, VuXML lives in XML +
Namespace world (see related recommendations).
> I saw your earlier message about XML::Node, but since I am not familiar
> with that (or XML::Parser), I did not understand what problem you were
> having. Could you try to describe it differently?
I'm not sure XML::Parser can handle namespace correctly. If it cannot
do such, parser will confuse when it reads markups with namespace.
Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama at imgsrc.co.jp> // IMG SRC, Inc.
<kuriyama at FreeBSD.org> // FreeBSD Project
More information about the freebsd-vuxml