BHyVe - ESXi comparison

[Matthias Gamsjager]

And lets not forget the head start vmware has (bhyve is what? 1-2 years
old?) and the size of it. Less then 1mb in code.


On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Łukasz Wąsikowski
<lukasz at wasikowski.net>wrote:

> W dniu 2014-01-28 12:18, Andrea Brancatelli pisze:
>
> > We did a very rough comparison betweend BHyVe and VMWare ESXi. Maybe you
> > want to give it a read and let me know if I did write a bunch of sh!t :-)
> >
> >
> http://andrea.brancatelli.it/2014/01/28/freebsd-10-0-bhyve-vmware-esxi-5-5-comparison/
> >
> > I must say I'm very pleased with BHyVe performances! Very good work!!
> >
> > Thanks for your time.
>
> You've wrote:
>
>
>     BHyVe took 332 seconds
>     VMWare took 313 seconds
>
> The difference is about 106.7%.
>
> I think that the correct conclusion should state: if we assume VMware's
> time as a reference than BHyVe was 6.7% slower (not 106.7%). And it
> should be 6,41% really :)
>
> --
> best regards,
> Lukasz Wasikowski
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-virtualization at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
> freebsd-virtualization-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>