From antipsychic at gmail.com Tue Jan 6 22:44:48 2009 From: antipsychic at gmail.com (Jake Thalacker) Date: Tue Jan 6 22:44:54 2009 Subject: fresh build Message-ID: Happy New Year! I've been encountering a problem with packets going where they're not supposed to regardless of static routes and ipfw rules meant to block said miss routed packets. My vimage setup is fairly complex and may well be the actual cause of the problem so haven't wanted to say anything till I knew more, for which I am no more closer. The one thing that really make me suspicious is it's inconsistent occurrence. At any rate am at a point where I can do a fresh build. My last build was from current in Sept and required some minor patch error clean ups, I use ng_nat and ng_ipfw which required current at the time I believe. Am going into the IPv6 world soon. Is there a fresh diff against current available? Cheers, and thanks for all the efforts! Jake From invite+kxwm5b4x at facebookmail.com Fri Jan 16 02:24:14 2009 From: invite+kxwm5b4x at facebookmail.com (Dima Antipov) Date: Fri Jan 16 02:24:21 2009 Subject: =?utf-8?q?D=C3=A9couvrez_mon_profil_Facebook?= Message-ID: <6f59eaa21fecd451f591eb6f5c34d094@localhost.localdomain> Bonjour Freebsd-virtualization, J'ai cr?? mon profil Facebook sur lequel je peux publier mes photos, mes vid?os et des ?v?nements. Je souhaite vous ajouter ? mes amis pour que vous puissiez y acc?der. Pour cela, vous devez d'abord vous inscrire ? Facebook ! Vous pourrez ensuite cr?er votre propre profil. Merci, Dima Pour vous inscrire ? Facebook, suivez le lien ci-dessous : http://www.facebook.com/p.php?i=1186987124&k=5XB5PWTRQ3YM5CBCRKYUTT&r From julian at elischer.org Sat Jan 31 01:20:36 2009 From: julian at elischer.org (Julian Elischer) Date: Sat Jan 31 01:20:42 2009 Subject: Vimage globals vs structures measurements. Message-ID: <498414E5.7020904@elischer.org> anyone who has commands and args for their favourite thing the'd like me to test... send it in.. so far using ttcp I have seem no measureable difference. but I have more tests to do of course.. for example throughput with small packets with ttcp (KB/Sec).... x VIMAGE_GLOBALS + NO_VIMAGE_GLOBALS +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ | + xx | | + xxx + | | + xxx x ++++ | | x + x + + xxxxxxx +++++ | |x + ++ xx xxx + ++++xxx x x x +++++ ***xxxxx ++++++++| | |_____________A______M______| | | |________________AM________________| | +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ N Min Max Median Avg Stddev x 40 48016.01 57361.32 56268.06 54915.582 2554.0133 + 40 48999.66 59646.59 56261.58 56086.798 3119.1782 From julian at elischer.org Sat Jan 31 02:12:46 2009 From: julian at elischer.org (Julian Elischer) Date: Sat Jan 31 02:12:58 2009 Subject: Vimage globals vs structures measurements. In-Reply-To: <498414E5.7020904@elischer.org> References: <498414E5.7020904@elischer.org> Message-ID: <4984241B.5010103@elischer.org> Julian Elischer wrote: > > anyone who has commands and args for their favourite > thing the'd like me to test... send it in.. > > > so far using ttcp I have seem no measureable difference. > > but I have more tests to do of course.. > > for example throughput with small packets with ttcp (KB/Sec).... > > > x VIMAGE_GLOBALS > + NO_VIMAGE_GLOBALS > +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ > | + xx | > | + xxx + | > | + xxx x ++++ | > | x + x + + xxxxxxx +++++ | > |x + ++ xx xxx + ++++xxx x x x +++++ ***xxxxx ++++++++| > | |_____________A______M______| | > | |________________AM________________| | > +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ > N Min Max Median Avg Stddev > x 40 48016.01 57361.32 56268.06 54915.582 2554.0133 > + 40 48999.66 59646.59 56261.58 56086.798 3119.1782 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" as I said before mst of my tests have shown no real change but this one has the most change I've seen.. it's 160 byte udp packets sent between two identical machines (both using the same kernel each time). x VIMAGE_GLOBALS + NO_VIMAGE_GLOBALS +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ | + + ++ xx x x | | + + ++ +x++x +xx x x | | + + +++ + +*+**x+xxxx x | | + +++ +++x*++*+**x*x*xx x x x | | + +*+++++x**+*+**x*x*x*xx x x xx | | ++++*++++****+*+**x*x****x xxxx xxx | | + + xx + ++++*++*+****+***********x*xxxxx xxxx x| |+ +*+++ xx++*+*+*+****+****************x***x*xxx*xx x xx x| | |__________A__________| | | |_________A________| | +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ N Min Max Median Avg Stddev x 150 10175.11 11292.11 10763.80 10760.77 200.92124 + 150 10075.64 11019.12 10591.68 10580.059 172.29227 Difference at 95.0% confidence -180.711 +/- 42.3572 -1.67935% +/- 0.393626% (Student's t, pooled s = 187.155) this one showed a 1.7% slowdown where the one above showed a half percent speedup (but not considered significant). The first one shown above was TCP with 1500 byte packets on bge 1G interfaces.. more test ideas appreciated...