From ru at FreeBSD.org Tue Jul 22 14:15:57 2003 From: ru at FreeBSD.org (Ruslan Ermilov) Date: Tue Jul 22 14:17:57 2003 Subject: cvs commit: src/release Makefile In-Reply-To: References: <20030722185621.GD80514@sunbay.com> Message-ID: <20030722211528.GA96342@sunbay.com> Here we go. Dear vendors, could you please publish your position on the below item? On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 03:05:59PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > On 22-Jul-2003 Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 02:46:00PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > >> >> >> On Tuesday 22 July 2003 05:04 am, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > >> >> >> > ru 2003/07/22 02:04:09 PDT > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > FreeBSD src repository > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Modified files: > >> >> >> > release Makefile > >> >> >> > Log: > >> >> >> > /floppies/boot.flp is no longer necessary on bootable i386 CD-ROMs. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Forgotten by: jhb > >> >> >> > >> >> >> I left it there so that people can choose which method they want to use > >> >> >> to make bootable CD's. It was intentional, not a bug. The method is > >> >> >> chosen at mkisofs invocation time, not when laying out the hierarchy. > >> >> >> > >> >> > How they can choose it? > >> >> > >> >> They don't use MAKE_ISOS and invoke mkisofs on their own. I have never > >> >> used MAKE_ISOS when building a release and have always used my own buildreliso > >> >> script. > >> >> > >> > So you agree there's no sense to keep the boot.flp on the second > >> > CD-ROM image in official version? Your own script can take care > >> > of copying it to the CD-ROM if necessary. > >> > >> No, my intention was to allow distributors like FreeBSD Mall, > >> BSD Mall, etc. to easily choose which method they wanted to use. > >> I.e., if they weren't comfortable with cdboot, they could still roll > >> an ISO from the same tree using boot.flp without having to jump > >> through hoops. However, if no one wants to use boot.flp anymore, > >> then it should be removed outright since 2.88 floppies don't "really" > >> exist in a useful fashion. > >> > > Murray, Chern, that's your call then. Would you like me to revert > > this change? Do you need the /floppies/boot.flp on the 1st and > > 2nd i386 CD-ROMs? > > The vendors@ list might be the best place to ask. -- Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software Ltd, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 187 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-vendors/attachments/20030723/c3505a55/attachment.bin