Serious breach of copyright -- First post

[David Hoffman]

Please note that they modified the page several times while I was involved
in this discussion.  That specific comment was about an old revision.

However, the current version of the site still has a problem:  while the
HouFUG copyright notice could be in reference to the page and not the
article, the notice doesn't make that at all clear.  This should be changed.

On 6/19/06, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des at des.no> wrote:
>
> "David Hoffman" <zionicman at gmail.com> writes:
> > It'll certainly be less confusing that what HouFUG is
> publishing.  They've
> > now noted on their site that it was written by you.  However, they STILL
> > claim they own the copyright.
>
> No, they claim a copyright for their site, which is perfectly valid -
> look up "compilation copyright" in your favorite search engine.
>
> DES
> --
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des at des.no
>