libusb performance on 8.1
doconnor at gsoft.com.au
Fri Jan 28 08:43:08 UTC 2011
On 28/01/2011, at 18:28, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> For this kind of applications ISOCHRONOUS transfers should be used. Then you
> can have a double buffer guard in the range 1-56ms, regardless of the buffer
> size the hardware uses.
Hmm, OK, I will have a look at changing it, although it is a bit of a pain because you can't stall an ISO EP and I'm using stall to indicate an error.
Is it possible to change the amount that is buffered? This is a specialised application so a custom kernel is no problem. Even a hint in the right direction would be greatly appreciated :)
> You could also try an XHCI controller, because the BULK buffering is done
> differently there.
OK thanks, I'll try that too.
>> I obviously don't need any more
>> throughput, however my application is very sensitive to latency, as I am
>> reading out of a fairly small FIFO and if it fills up my entire run has to
>> be aborted.
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
-- Andrew Tanenbaum
GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C
More information about the freebsd-usb