kern_yield vs ukbd_yield
Andriy Gapon
avg at FreeBSD.org
Sun Dec 11 21:24:17 UTC 2011
Does the following change do what I think that it does?
Thank you!
Author: Andriy Gapon <avg at icyb.net.ua>
Date: Thu Sep 1 16:50:13 2011 +0300
ukbd: drop local duplicate of kern_yield and use that instead
diff --git a/sys/dev/usb/input/ukbd.c b/sys/dev/usb/input/ukbd.c
index 086c178..8078cbb 100644
--- a/sys/dev/usb/input/ukbd.c
+++ b/sys/dev/usb/input/ukbd.c
@@ -399,33 +399,6 @@ ukbd_put_key(struct ukbd_softc *sc, uint32_t key)
}
static void
-ukbd_yield(void)
-{
- struct thread *td = curthread;
- uint32_t old_prio;
-
- DROP_GIANT();
-
- thread_lock(td);
-
- /* get current priority */
- old_prio = td->td_base_pri;
-
- /* set new priority */
- sched_prio(td, td->td_user_pri);
-
- /* cause a task switch */
- mi_switch(SW_INVOL | SWT_RELINQUISH, NULL);
-
- /* restore priority */
- sched_prio(td, old_prio);
-
- thread_unlock(td);
-
- PICKUP_GIANT();
-}
-
-static void
ukbd_do_poll(struct ukbd_softc *sc, uint8_t wait)
{
@@ -439,7 +412,7 @@ ukbd_do_poll(struct ukbd_softc *sc, uint8_t wait)
while (sc->sc_inputs == 0) {
/* give USB threads a chance to run */
- ukbd_yield();
+ kern_yield(-1);
/* check if we should wait */
if (!wait)
--
Andriy Gapon
More information about the freebsd-usb
mailing list