panic: uhci_abort_xfer: not in process context (was Re: uplcom / ucom problems on RELENG_5)

Fri Apr 1 06:50:54 PST 2005

At 09:31 AM 01/04/2005, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:

>What dmsg appears when you attach your device? If "ugen", then make sure you
>have got "device ucom" and "device uplcom", in the kernel config file. If you
>are loading "ucom"/"uplcom" from modules, make sure that those modules are
>re-compiled. Else try to enable debugging and see what happens:

Hi,
         It was showing up as a ucom device.  Also, the patches no longer 
apply cleanly after the MFCs that were done yesterday afternoon.  I also 
have a CURRENT box I can test against if thats easier to try against. Do 
you know if the patches apply cleanly on it ?

Here it is on RELENG_5 as of this morning

(bzcat new_usb_1_5_4.diff.bz2 | patch -N -l -d /usr/src) || echo -n
Hmm...  Looks like a new-style context diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|*** sys/i386/include/bus_at386.h.ref   Wed Oct 20 21:32:58 2004
|--- sys/i386/include/bus_at386.h       Sat Nov 11 11:11:00 2000
--------------------------
Patching file sys/i386/include/bus_at386.h using Plan A...
Hunk #1 failed at 67.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 293.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 303.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 329.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 339.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 365.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 375.
Hunk #8 succeeded at 421.
Hunk #9 succeeded at 432.
Hunk #10 succeeded at 474.
Hunk #11 succeeded at 485.
Hunk #12 succeeded at 527.
Hunk #13 succeeded at 538.
Hunk #14 succeeded at 686.
Hunk #15 succeeded at 696.
Hunk #16 succeeded at 722.
Hunk #17 succeeded at 732.
Hunk #18 succeeded at 758.
Hunk #19 succeeded at 768.
Hunk #20 succeeded at 815.
Hunk #21 succeeded at 826.
Hunk #22 succeeded at 868.
Hunk #23 succeeded at 879.
Hunk #24 succeeded at 921.
Hunk #25 succeeded at 932.
1 out of 25 hunks failed--saving rejects to sys/i386/include/bus_at386.h.rej
Hmm...  The next patch looks like a new-style context diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|*** sys/dev/usb/ukbd.c.ref     Wed Nov 17 18:56:27 2004
|--- sys/dev/usb/ukbd.c Tue Feb  8 16:32:43 2005
--------------------------
Patching file sys/dev/usb/ukbd.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 53 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 238 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 685 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 693 (offset -1 lines).
Hmm...  The next patch looks like a new-style context diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|*** sys/dev/usb/umass.c.ref    Wed Nov 17 18:56:27 2004
|--- sys/dev/usb/umass.c        Thu Dec  2 12:39:51 2004
--------------------------
Patching file sys/dev/usb/umass.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 110.
Hunk #2 failed at 929.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 1198 (offset 19 lines).
1 out of 3 hunks failed--saving rejects to sys/dev/usb/umass.c.rej
Hmm...  The next patch looks like a new-style context diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|*** sys/dev/usb/umodem.c.ref   Wed Nov 17 18:56:27 2004
|--- sys/dev/usb/umodem.c       Wed Nov 17 18:07:39 2004
--------------------------
Patching file sys/dev/usb/umodem.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 83.
Hmm...  The next patch looks like a new-style context diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|*** sys/dev/usb/uvisor.c.ref   Wed Nov 17 18:56:27 2004
|--- sys/dev/usb/uvisor.c       Wed Nov 17 18:08:05 2004
--------------------------
Patching file sys/dev/usb/uvisor.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 62.
Hmm...  The next patch looks like a new-style context diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|*** sys/dev/usb/ucycom.c.ref   Sat Jan  8 16:06:02 2005
|--- sys/dev/usb/ucycom.c       Sat Jan  8 16:06:24 2005
--------------------------
Patching file sys/dev/usb/ucycom.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 failed at 46.
1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to sys/dev/usb/ucycom.c.rej
Hmm...  The next patch looks like a new-style context diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|*** sys/dev/usb/hid.c.ref      Wed Nov 17 19:57:23 2004
|--- sys/dev/usb/hid.c  Wed Nov 17 19:58:38 2004
--------------------------
Patching file sys/dev/usb/hid.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 55.
Hmm...  The next patch looks like a new-style context diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|*** sys/dev/usb/usb_quirks.c.ref       Wed Nov 17 19:59:07 2004
|--- sys/dev/usb/usb_quirks.c   Wed Nov 17 19:59:20 2004
--------------------------
Patching file sys/dev/usb/usb_quirks.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 48.
done
touch /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/usbdevs
touch /usr/src/sys/dev/usb2/*
(([ ! -f /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/usbhid.h ] ||  (cat 
/usr/src/sys/dev/usb/usbhid.h | grep "include <dev/usb2/usb.h>" > 
/dev/null)) &&  (cp /usr/src/sys/dev/usb2/usb_hid_copy.h 
/usr/src/sys/dev/usb/usbhid.h)) || echo -n
rm -f /usr/include/dev/usb2/* || echo -n
cp -v /usr/src/sys/dev/usb2/*h /usr/include/dev/usb2/ || echo -n
/usr/src/sys/dev/usb2/ehci.h -> /usr/include/dev/usb2/ehci.h
/usr/src/sys/dev/usb2/usb_quirks.h -> /usr/include/dev/usb2/usb_quirks.h
/usr/src/sys/dev/usb2/usb_port.h -> /usr/include/dev/usb2/usb_port.h
/usr/src/sys/dev/usb2/usb_hid_copy.h -> /usr/include/dev/usb2/usb_hid_copy.h
/usr/src/sys/dev/usb2/usb_hid.h -> /usr/include/dev/usb2/usb_hid.h
/usr/src/sys/dev/usb2/usb.h -> /usr/include/dev/usb2/usb.h
/usr/src/sys/dev/usb2/uhci.h -> /usr/include/dev/usb2/uhci.h
/usr/src/sys/dev/usb2/ohci.h -> /usr/include/dev/usb2/ohci.h
/usr/src/sys/dev/usb2/hid.h -> /usr/include/dev/usb2/hid.h
/usr/src/sys/dev/usb2/usb_subr.h -> /usr/include/dev/usb2/usb_subr.h
cat /usr/src/include/Makefile  | sed -e s/" dev\/usb2 "/""/g  | sed -e 
s/"LSUBDIRS="/"LSUBDIRS= dev\/usb2 "/g  > tempfile
cat tempfile > /usr/src/include/Makefile
cat /usr/src/sys/conf/kmod.mk  | sed -e s/"@\/dev\/usb\/usbdevs 
-h"/"@\/dev\/usb\/usbdevs"/g  | sed -e s/"@\/dev\/usb\/usbdevs 
-d"/"@\/dev\/usb\/usbdevs"/g  > tempfile
cat tempfile > /usr/src/sys/conf/kmod.mk
[releng5-865]#

         ---Mike