libthr status

Julian Elischer julian at elischer.org
Wed Nov 1 18:07:43 UTC 2006


gnn at freebsd.org wrote:
> At Tue, 31 Oct 2006 07:18:15 +0800,
> David Xu wrote:
>> [1  <text/plain; iso-8859-1 (7bit)>]
>> On Tuesday 31 October 2006 02:23, gnn at freebsd.org wrote:
>>>> I will hack at kernel side, but who will hack userland utilities ?
>>>> e.g the /usr/bin/limits program.
>>> How hard is that to do?  If it's "easy" then I can sign up to do that.
>>>
>> I think it is not hard, but I think one at least has to hack
>> /usr/bin/limits, sh and csh which are in our base system.
> 
> I will take on the task when you have the kernel side in place.
> 
>> I will update them and make them reviewed.
>>
> 
> Great!
> 
> Thanks,
> George
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-threads at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-threads-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"


in a manner of speaking, I wonder if that the thread limit should
be just related to the process limit..

i.e. N threads count to be 1 process..

if you use linuxthreads of rfork() then you are limited
to the process limit.. why should the other threads be different?

just a thought.



More information about the freebsd-threads mailing list