Strawman proposal: making libthr default thread implementation?

David Xu davidxu at freebsd.org
Mon Jul 3 22:12:46 UTC 2006


On Monday 03 July 2006 21:44, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Jul 2006, David Xu wrote:
> > On Monday 03 July 2006 20:40, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> >> No, I think those are what libthr lacks in supporting POSIX.
> >> I think the problem will be getting our 3 kernel schedulers to
> >> support them.
> >
> > it is mutex code and priority propagating which is already
> > supported by turnstile code, in theory, it is not depended
> > on scheduler.
>
> Sure it is.  SCHED_FIFO and SCHED_RR are scheduling attributes.
> Mutex code and priority propagation have nothing to do with
> this.

I have never said SCHED_FIFO and SCHED_RR is related to mutex,
in fact, I am confused that you always said them at same time.



More information about the freebsd-threads mailing list