Thread Local Storage
Julian Elischer
julian at elischer.org
Mon Mar 29 15:40:59 PST 2004
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Peter Wemm wrote:
> On Monday 29 March 2004 02:36 pm, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> [..]
> > > > > You don't need a syscall at thread switch if you do something
> > > > > like:
> > > > >
> > > > > _thread_switch(...)
> > > > > {
> > > > > if (tcb doesn't have LDT entry) {
> > > > > if (!free LDT entries)
> > > > > steal LDT entry from non-running thread;
> > > > > allocate LDT entry and point it at TLS goop for tcb.
> > > > > }
> > > > > load_gs(tcb's LDT sel);
> > > >
> > > > That's a system call on amd64.
> > >
> > > I'm not quite up to speed on amd64. So in 64-bit mode it doesn't
> > > really have an LDT at all, is that right?
> >
> > I'm not sure, but you have to make a system call to set it
> > or it's equivalent (amd64_set_fsbase()).
>
> Correct. There are two ways to do these things on this cpu. One is to
> use descriptor tables. The catch is that using descriptor tables
> forces a 4GB limit. It won't wrap around. The other way is to write
> to the MSRs for fsbase/gsbase. But the downside of that is that is a
> priviliged operation and needs to be done in supervisor mode.
>
> I don't *have* an LDT on the amd64 kernel. I'm dreading having to
> emulate the i386 sysarch LDT stuff already.
Hopefully we can migrate to the GDT idea..
> --
> Peter Wemm - peter at wemm.org; peter at FreeBSD.org; peter at yahoo-inc.com
> "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-threads at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-threads-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>
More information about the freebsd-threads
mailing list