Who can commit this.. kse vs ULE

[Julian Elischer]

Scott here's the patch I mentioned...
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 18:30:45 -0800
From: David O'Brien <obrien at freebsd.org>
To: Taku YAMAMOTO <taku at cent.saitama-u.ac.jp>
Cc: freebsd-current at freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] for SCHED_ULE & libpthread issue (was Re: I like

	SCHED_4BSD)

On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 09:23:47AM +0900, Taku YAMAMOTO wrote:
> Until the problem is fully addressed, I will propose following patch
> to be applied. (the least intrusive one attached in the former message)
 
Do people think we should commit this?

--- sched_ule.c.orig	Fri Feb 13 05:24:48 2004
+++ sched_ule.c	Fri Feb 13 05:37:53 2004
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@
#define	SCHED_INTERACTIVE(kg)						\
     (sched_interact_score(kg) < SCHED_INTERACT_THRESH)
#define	SCHED_CURR(kg, ke)						\
-    (ke->ke_thread->td_priority != kg->kg_user_pri ||			\
+    (ke->ke_thread->td_priority < kg->kg_user_pri ||			\
     SCHED_INTERACTIVE(kg))
 
 /*
@@ -1166,11 +1166,8 @@
 	 */
 	if ((ke->ke_flags & KEF_ASSIGNED) == 0) {
 		if (TD_IS_RUNNING(td)) {
-			if (td->td_proc->p_flag & P_SA) {
-				kseq_load_rem(KSEQ_CPU(ke->ke_cpu), ke);
-				setrunqueue(td);
-			} else 
-				kseq_runq_add(KSEQ_SELF(), ke);
+			kseq_load_rem(KSEQ_CPU(ke->ke_cpu), ke);
+			setrunqueue(td);
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current at freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"