sysinstall as a post-install tool

Devin Teske devin.teske at fisglobal.com
Wed Jan 4 22:56:17 UTC 2012


On Jan 3, 2012, at 7:27 PM, Ron McDowell wrote:

> 
> 
> Devin Teske wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On Jan 3, 2012, at 6:57 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
>> 
>>> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Ron McDowell <rcm at fuzzwad.org> wrote:
>>>> I [Ron] just added myself to the sysinstall list.
>>> 
>>> Good
>>>> 
>>>> What I envision is a text based system administration suite that will
>>>> [hopefully] do everything that the "Configure" option on the top level of
>>>> the sysinstall menu does.  I see it as being part of the base OS, such that
>>>> once one has rebooted from HD after the install and logged in as root [or
>>>> user+su], a menu can be brought up by entering "sysadmin" or such.  Does
>>>> "sysadmin" work for a name?  I kinda like it.
>>> 
>>> Do you plan on this tool being run "late in the game" after the system
>>> has been used for a while or this is a "welcome new user" only tool?
>>> 
>>>> I plan on basically going through the sysinstall post-configuration menu:
>>> 
>>> [snip configure menu]
>>> 
>>> Do you plan on making this a C based program or a shell script?
>> 
>> If he plans on making it sh(1) based, then I wonder if he would be interested in starting with host-setup as a very solid and robust substrate.
>> 
>> I was just about to start building the port Makefile and getting host-setup to fill this exact need.
>> 
>> We @vicor have been working on this exact thing for years now.
>> 
>> I feel that it would be a *very* simple task to add the remaining [missing] menu items considering how hard it was to simply get this far.
>> 
>> host-setup ... (we can change the name; I'll have to sleep on "sysadmin" -- leaning more toward perhaps "sysconfig" ... it's the logical name considering we're taking the "Config[uration]" menu from "sys[install]", so the name ought to perhaps be "sysconfig") ... is a multi-thousand-line shell script that uses a very full-proof approach to solving the problem. It's unbreakable in its current form and has undergone hundreds of hours of testing (it's current version is 4.0.1).
>> 
>> Oh, and it's BSD Licensed.
>> 
>> Oh, and it's FreeBSD specific (originally works on both Linux and FreeBSD, but we've stripped the Linux stuff to make it FreeBSD-clean).
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>>> and as close as reasonable, stick to the same task flow.  I plan on writing
>>>> it against 10-current and look at back-porting to 9 after it's somewhat
>>>> stable.
>>> 
>> 
>> If you use host-setup as a substrate, it works on FreeBSD-4.x up to 10-CURRENT (tested 4.8, 4.11, 8.1, 9-CURRENT and 10-CURRENT).
>> 
>> 
>>> I'd like to work with you on this, especially w.r.t to ensuring that
>>> it meets the requirements for entering the base system.
>>> 
>> 
>> I too would like to work with you on this, regardless of language used or whether you use host-setup as a substrate or not.
>> 
>> We also maintain a custom version of sysinstall in-house. So we're intimately involved with all of the code.
>> 
>> 
>>>> One new, important, and not-so-difficult task will be: on exiting, check the
>>>> sanity of /etc/rc.conf and complain if needed, but allow the user to
>>>> override the safety-switch if foot-shooting is really requested.  :)  I'm a
>>>> firm believer of not disallowing anything.
>> 
>>> Good on both counts.
>> 
>> host-setup actually leverages the power and safety of my sysrc(8) utility (just added to ports tree as sysutils/sysrc).
>> 
>> In fact, sysrc was written as a test-script solely to feed back into host-setup so that we could replace sysinstall's Configure menu. We're just not there with all the menu items (but we've got the most important ones -- IMHO -- and made them rock-stable).
>> -- 
>> Devin
>> 
>> Links:
>> http://druidbsd.sourceforge.net/
>> http://druidbsd.sourceforge.net/download/host-setup.txt
>> http://druidbsd.sourceforge.net/download/sysrc.txt
>> _____________
>> The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you.
> 
> Devin, thanks, this looks very intriguing, pulling it down now.  And sysconfig is a good name, better than sysadmin.


After sleeping on it, I'm actually thinking "bsdconfig" is a better name.

My reasoning is that "sysinstall" was C-based and "bsdinstall" is sh(1) based. A "sysconfig" might imply sysinstall-roots, when in reality it's a rewrite based on sh(1) and thus my reasoning is that "bsdconfig" would be a better name.
-- 
Devin


_____________
The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you.


More information about the freebsd-sysinstall mailing list