64-bit NULL: a followup

[Marcel Moolenaar]

On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 11:43:25PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <20031129055619.GA48381 at dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net>
>             Marcel Moolenaar <marcel at xcllnt.net> writes:
> : Ok, so what is better (void*)0 or 0L?
> 
> ... It needs to be 0L for C++, but in C either is fine. ...

Then there's no question that 0L is better, because it doesn't break
C++. Elementary...

-- 
 Marcel Moolenaar	  USPA: A-39004		 marcel at xcllnt.net