svn - but smaller?

[David Demelier]

Yes that would be great to have svnup into base as we had with cvsup then I
will be able to fetch ports/base without doing any other steps before :)


2013/3/11 Isaac (.ike) Levy <ike at blackskyresearch.net>

> On Feb 23, 2013, at 7:36 PM, John Mehr wrote:
>
> >   Hello all,
> >   I've believe I've made just about all of the progress optimizing svnup
> >   as I can and I've just submitted it as a new port.  With my ~ 350kb/s
> >   DSL connection, it now takes just under 30 minutes to download a fresh
> >   base/releng/8.3 tree using svnup (Subversion's svn takes approximately
> >   12 minutes).  Incremental updates, such as tracking one of the stable
> >   branches takes only 2-3 minutes.
> >   For anyone that wants to preview the port before it gets added to the
> >   ports tree (assuming I got the send-pr correct), the tarball is located
> >   at:
> >   http://jcm.dsl.visi.com/freebsd/svnup/svnup-0.5.tar.xz
> >   Please let me know if you find any issues.
>
> If anyone has any info about sunup(1) making it's way into base, please
> tell me so I can kill this page:
>
> https://wiki.freebsd.org/UsersFetchingSource
>
> (After trying to catch up on the relevant lists, I just updated that
> 'status page' on the FreeBSD wiki.)
>
> --
> John, this is spectacular- thank you!
>
> Rocket-
> .ike
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-stable at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>



-- 
Demelier David