Request for flowtable testers and actionable feedback RE:
flowtable usable or not
hm at hm.net.br
Mon Mar 5 05:29:14 UTC 2012
K. Macy wrote:
> I'm re-sending this portion of another mail as it will inevitably not
> be read by most readers by virtue of having been part of a long and
> digressive thread.
this is exactly one of this statements which makes users (normal people)
a person-person understand this as "shut up fuckers, you're disturbing
my privileged thinking, how do you dare you little nothings"
and certainly not going along with your quoted anti-nazi statement
below, well, thinking better, the last paragraph may apply ...
what you said here before
>... any progress, any improvements, any
> advancements will only happen because *we* made it happen.
bravo!!! hurray!!! Mr. *WE* Sir Judge of the poor souls... you have
really balls to write such a thing, do you?
in modern people conversations, this what you call digressive, we call
it brainstorming and it is _highly_ desirable, because talking together
leads to new ideas, what you apparently refuse to acknowledge
you do shit when you have a close mind
some people simply do not get the big picture because they only see
themselves, their interests and personal reflection in the pretended
and that my friend, certainly is no progress at all ...
ohh you know what is funny? At the end, you are one of these in your own
> The real damage is done by those millions who want to 'get by.'
because you don't care about what really matters, people, users, you do
not even know how to talk to them
I might go with Doug's frustration
> Clearly you are either unable or unwilling to see my point, so I wish
> you all the best.
and what he said gently in another thread, I still did not agreed that
time, but now I'm coming closer
>That's only true if the project leadership agrees with your goals
Sooo all you Mr. *WEs* good work! we worship you until the rest of your
days and beyond
> “The real damage is done by those millions who want to 'get by.'
> The ordinary men who just want to be left in peace. Those who don’t
> want their little lives disturbed by anything bigger than themselves.
> Those with no sides and no causes. Those who won’t take measure of
> their own strength, for fear of antagonizing their own weakness. Those
> who don’t like to make waves—or enemies.
> Those for whom freedom, honour, truth, and principles are only
> literature. Those who live small, love small, die small. It’s the
> reductionist approach to life: if you keep it small, you’ll keep it
> under control. If you don’t make any noise, the bogeyman won’t find
> But it’s all an illusion, because they die too, those people who
> roll up their spirits into tiny little balls so as to be safe. Safe?!
> >From what? Life is always on the edge of death; narrow streets lead to
> the same place as wide avenues, and a little candle burns itself out
> just like a flaming torch does.
> I choose my own way to burn.”
> Sophie Scholl
> freebsd-stable at freebsd.org mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20120305/7af626bd/signature.pgp
More information about the freebsd-stable