em interfaces supermicro X9SCM-F board / X9SCA-F
Sebastian Stach
sebsta at t-online.de
Sun Jun 10 19:42:59 UTC 2012
Am 09.06.2012 um 10:51 schrieb Miroslav Lachman:
> Hi,
>
> I changed the switch to 1Gbps and run the test again.
>
> No problems with the NICs. The iperf is running for 10 hours now. 2TB of data was transmitted in both directions.
>
> I am running an endless loop on a client side
>
> while 1
> iperf -c xx.xx.xx.xx --format k -m -p 999 -t 1800 -d
> sleep 5
> end
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Server listening on TCP port 999
> TCP window size: 64.0 KByte (default)
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Client connecting to yy.yy.yy.yy, TCP port 999
> TCP window size: 137 KByte (default)
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> [ 5] local xx.xx.xx.xx port 18834 connected with yy.yy.yy.yy port 999
> [ 4] local xx.xx.xx.xx port 999 connected with yy.yy.yy.yy port 59754
> [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
> [ 4] 0.0-1800.0 sec 82823213 KBytes 376938 Kbits/sec
> [ 4] MSS size 1448 bytes (MTU 1500 bytes, ethernet)
> [ 5] 0.0-1800.0 sec 73954944 KBytes 336575 Kbits/sec
> [ 5] MSS size 1448 bytes (MTU 1500 bytes, ethernet)
>
>
> And another endless loop on server side
>
> while 1
> iperf -s -p 999
> end
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Server listening on TCP port 999
> TCP window size: 64.0 KByte (default)
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> [ 4] local yy.yy.yy.yy port 999 connected with xx.xx.xx.xx port 18834
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Client connecting to xx.xx.xx.xx, TCP port 999
> TCP window size: 65.0 KByte (default)
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> [ 6] local yy.yy.yy.yy port 59754 connected with xx.xx.xx.xx port 999
> Waiting for server threads to complete. Interrupt again to force quit.
> [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
> [ 6] 0.0-1800.0 sec 79.0 GBytes 377 Mbits/sec
> [ 4] 0.0-1800.0 sec 70.5 GBytes 337 Mbits/sec
>
>
> Client is on the Supermicro X9SCA-F
>
> em0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 options=4219b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4,WOL_MAGIC,VLAN_HWTSO>
> ether 00:25:90:73:d1:76
> inet xx.xx.xx.xx netmask 0xffffff80 broadcast xx.xx.xx.xx
> media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
> status: active
>
>
> Server is running on the Cisco UCS C200 M2
>
> igb0: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 options=401bb<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4,VLAN_HWTSO>
> ether 50:57:a8:af:eb:0a
> inet yy.yy.yy.yy netmask 0xffffff80 broadcast yy.yy.yy.yy
> media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
> status: active
>
> Both sides are running FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE amd64 GENERIC
>
> So the only difference is that I am using NIC em0 in shared mode for remote management. Can you try your test with shared mode?
>
> Miroslav Lachman
I did a test on my system again. My second NIC is working without problems
but the first one is still hanging after a while even when configured in shared mode.
I will contact the support again and if the issue cannot be resolved shortly i will
RMA the board.
Thanks again for doing the test on your system.
Sebastian Stach
More information about the freebsd-stable
mailing list