Reducing the need to compile a custom kernel
c.kworr at gmail.com
Mon Feb 13 15:05:47 UTC 2012
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> I want to note here: the pf ALTQ options are a pain in the butt, quite
> honestly. I've found in the past that removing the ones you don't use
> won't result in a successful build, thus one must include them all. We
> do need ALTQ support though, for rate-limiting capability. The NOPCC
> option is needed for SMP builds, which makes me wonder what the state of
> SMP is in this regard -- meaning, on non-SMP builds, is it still safe
> to include ALTQ_NOPCC?
It seems like I'm missing something. What is good about using non-SMP
Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow.
More information about the freebsd-stable