Does / Is anyone maintaining CVS for FreeBSD?

[Eitan Adler]

On 31 December 2012 15:40, Chris H <chris#@1command.com> wrote:
> Sigh...
> IM(NS)HO; SVN is an inferior RCS created so Windows users wouldn't feel
> left out.

SVN has a number of features which makes development much easier.

What did you find easier to accomplish with CVS than with SVN?

> Are there _any_ CVS servers/trunks/tree's left? If so, how _current_ are
> they?

Ports and Source currently have CVS trees.
Ports has an explicit EoL on February 28th (2 months from today)
Source does not have an explicit EoL though it *is* considered deprecated.


-- 
Eitan Adler