How do I circumvent the use of clang during build?

Tim Daneliuk tundra at tundraware.com
Mon Dec 17 02:18:46 UTC 2012


As I understand it, gcc is still the default on 9

-----
Tim Daneliuk

Chris H <chris#@1command.com> wrote:

>Greetings,
> I recently made a <failed> attempt to move from RELENG_8
>to RELENG_9. I've been on BSD since the early 80's, and with
>the exception of a couple of failed kernels (my fault), I've
>never had one failure with the build(world|kernel) ||
>install(world|kernel). The only notable difference I noticed,
>was the addition of clang. While I can't (yet) conclusively
>blame it on clang. I _can_ say, that the whole process took _3_
>times longer, than without. So my question is; is it possible
>to build(world|kernel) && install(world|kernel) without the
>clang toolchain? If for no other reason but to discover whether
>clang was responsible for the failure, and whether building w/o
>clang is any faster.
>
>Thank you for all your time, and consideration.
>
>--Chris
>
>_______________________________________________
>freebsd-stable at freebsd.org mailing list
>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"


More information about the freebsd-stable mailing list