non-responding processes after truss(1)ing
nonesuch at longcount.org
Tue Sep 27 13:28:58 UTC 2011
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 6:19 AM, Nikos Vassiliadis <nvass at gmx.com> wrote:
> On 9/27/2011 1:10 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>> kill -9 your truss processes; the underlying processes which you are
>> truss'ing will probably resume.
>> My experience for years has been that truss on FreeBSD is extremely
>> buggy and cannot be relied upon (case in point). Such is still the case
>> on RELENG_8 as of today.
>> Use ktrace(1) instead. You'll find it to work pretty much in every
What about using dtruss in place of truss is the dtrace implementation
of truss any better then the old libkvm ?
> Thanks, that worked. I'll use ktrace from now on.
> freebsd-stable at freebsd.org mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
mark saad | nonesuch at longcount.org
More information about the freebsd-stable